In this paper a specific method of interpreting arguments is developed and justified. The aim of this method is to transform given arguments, crude as they are, into some sort of idealized version, which then has to be assessed with respect to its argumentative validity and adequacy on the basis of precise criteria provided by the Practical Theory of Argumentation. The general guidelines for an interpretation with this aim are justified and elaborated up to the level of detailed procedural rules, which can be used even in classroom for analyzing usual scientific arguments.
Lumer, C. (2003). Interpreting Arguments. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp.715-719). Sic Sat.
Interpreting Arguments
LUMER, CHRISTOPH
2003-01-01
Abstract
In this paper a specific method of interpreting arguments is developed and justified. The aim of this method is to transform given arguments, crude as they are, into some sort of idealized version, which then has to be assessed with respect to its argumentative validity and adequacy on the basis of precise criteria provided by the Practical Theory of Argumentation. The general guidelines for an interpretation with this aim are justified and elaborated up to the level of detailed procedural rules, which can be used even in classroom for analyzing usual scientific arguments.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
A059_Lumer_InterpretingArguments_print.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Post-print
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
117.99 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
117.99 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/18184
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo