A Close up to Social and Governmental Factors: The introduction of the Limit to Economic Growth and Development

The first part develops governmental mainstream economic growth modelling, whose novelty is including a due to provisions Limited Parametric Change that allows us to formalize and get new insights (Such as the formation of rules of thumb, due to synesthesia flagged levels' balances, pareto optimals and human-non-human solutions' comparisons to the decentralized one) on the evolution of formal basic services deprivations, and fairly continuing, The growth impact of the public investments and expenditures considering excludable provisions, congestion, extra capacity, and the arise of an extra pressuring class of capital (2nd chapter). The results in these models is consistent with the Kaldorian commandments for growth as well as with data tests such as the one of Barro (1989 as referenced in Barro, 1990). Even more, these models are as well consistent with stylized facts as exposed in Stauvermann and Kumar (2014). Therefore thus this part closes with the introduction to possible developments within the spirit of Postkeynesianism, after the fair inclusion of the Cambridge capital controversy, recognizing the introduction of the limit as this part's contribution, which in reverse is consistent with data on access to public utilities (see Steckel et al. 2014). By considering the role of the social patterns in the total production, the 2nd part (3rd Chapter), first assessing the impingement of the patterns on the total production throughout endogenizing he formation of influential groups such as elites, proceeds with her investigation of the individual aftermath as well finding the impact of discrimination. We obtain he results of grouping skills and discrimination in the closed matching and the total production, fairly enveloping effects such as the one of wealth inequality on growth. Accounting for other related impacts, a posterior section through a fixed point theorem, gets the necessary conditions for technological change, which considers among other aspects the impact of the media and governmental structures, as well impplying a limit This section in reverse all the way, under the Keynesian wing, fairly moves away from institutional-behavioral economics dealings to introduce the notion of mécaniques, implying the economic growth measurement space of the distances from the limit (overcoming endemic to mainstream growth measurement misconceptions, and thus constituting the true economic recursivity spirit). Fair results of this part are: Undoing wealthy influential groups such as elites takes to the limit of economic growth; Basically a trade off between general equilibrium and achieving-remaining in the limit; The existence of the circuit (which differentiates from falling short Nash equilibria) where geography or geometry becomes quite a determinant issue . In a considerable global sense, provided the previous time layers of content, the of high gravity novelty of the thesis as a whole is the introduction of the limit to economic growth, which in singularity allows for the consideration of the mécaniques that we can geographically painlessly think to empirically address from further serious calibrated neuroeconomics experiments, under the lines of Lorenz and Montague (2003) i.e. of humans embedded in society, but up to the limit. Reswitching, The thesis provides fairly further hints for the geographic location of the "feminamlimitus" (as well in turn "homolimitus") that evidently conceives the famously addressed "homoeconomicus" and "homorealitus" classes locations (see Cullis and Jones, 2008 as a prosthesis)].