Background/Purpose: The use of extracorporeal life sup- port (ECLS) in the cath lab has increased in recent years, as it provides adequate support during high‐risk angioplasty pro- cedures (HR‐PCI). Timing of ECLS initiation is crucial and we aim to elucidate the diffecences in early outcome between elective or rescue (ECPR) use of VA‐ECMO during HR‐PCI. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the use of venous‐ar- terial ECMO (VA‐ECMO) as a support during HR‐PCI for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with cariogenic shock (CS). Only the patients who met the criteria of the ELSO guide- lines were selected for receiving VA‐ECMO. The results of the group in which the VA‐ECMO was started electively be- fore or after the procedure were analyzed and compared with the group of patients in which it was started under cardiac massage after hemodynamic deterioration (ECPR) during the procedure. Results: From July 2013 to May 2017, 14 patients aged 60.1 ± 9.26 year received VA‐ECMO for ACS, with the clin- ical diagnosis of (CS). In seven patients the VA‐ECMO was initiated pre‐PCI or post‐PCI (sliding fast on inotropic sup- port), while in the other seven patients the VA‐ECMO was used as ECPR after hemodynamic collapse during the pro- cedure. The ECMO setup was percutaneously in all patients through the femoral vessels. All patients received culprit le- sion revascularization. Intra‐aortic balloon pump (IABP) was used in 11 patients (78.5%), preoperatively in 100% of theECPR group. We were able to wean four patients in the “elec- tive” group, while only three in the ECPR group; one patient was discharged on support and transplanted. The “elective group” had a lower mortality (2 [28.6%] vs 4 [57.1%]; “elec- tive” vs “ECPR” group). Conclusions: Elective use of VA‐ECMO for high‐risk PCI is associated, even in this small series, with improved in‐hospi- tal survival. Our results foster the pre‐PCI use of VA‐ECMO in HR‐PCI patients presenting with CS.

Bianchi, G., Haxhiademi, D., Sorbo, S., De Caterina, A.r., Guarino, M., Berti, S., et al. (2020). Elective institution of ECLS for primary PCI is associated with improved outcomes. A single center experience. ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 64-64 [10.1111/aor.13651].

Elective institution of ECLS for primary PCI is associated with improved outcomes. A single center experience

BIANCHI G
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Background/Purpose: The use of extracorporeal life sup- port (ECLS) in the cath lab has increased in recent years, as it provides adequate support during high‐risk angioplasty pro- cedures (HR‐PCI). Timing of ECLS initiation is crucial and we aim to elucidate the diffecences in early outcome between elective or rescue (ECPR) use of VA‐ECMO during HR‐PCI. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the use of venous‐ar- terial ECMO (VA‐ECMO) as a support during HR‐PCI for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with cariogenic shock (CS). Only the patients who met the criteria of the ELSO guide- lines were selected for receiving VA‐ECMO. The results of the group in which the VA‐ECMO was started electively be- fore or after the procedure were analyzed and compared with the group of patients in which it was started under cardiac massage after hemodynamic deterioration (ECPR) during the procedure. Results: From July 2013 to May 2017, 14 patients aged 60.1 ± 9.26 year received VA‐ECMO for ACS, with the clin- ical diagnosis of (CS). In seven patients the VA‐ECMO was initiated pre‐PCI or post‐PCI (sliding fast on inotropic sup- port), while in the other seven patients the VA‐ECMO was used as ECPR after hemodynamic collapse during the pro- cedure. The ECMO setup was percutaneously in all patients through the femoral vessels. All patients received culprit le- sion revascularization. Intra‐aortic balloon pump (IABP) was used in 11 patients (78.5%), preoperatively in 100% of theECPR group. We were able to wean four patients in the “elec- tive” group, while only three in the ECPR group; one patient was discharged on support and transplanted. The “elective group” had a lower mortality (2 [28.6%] vs 4 [57.1%]; “elec- tive” vs “ECPR” group). Conclusions: Elective use of VA‐ECMO for high‐risk PCI is associated, even in this small series, with improved in‐hospi- tal survival. Our results foster the pre‐PCI use of VA‐ECMO in HR‐PCI patients presenting with CS.
2020
Bianchi, G., Haxhiademi, D., Sorbo, S., De Caterina, A.r., Guarino, M., Berti, S., et al. (2020). Elective institution of ECLS for primary PCI is associated with improved outcomes. A single center experience. ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 64-64 [10.1111/aor.13651].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1221484
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo