This chapter looks at the listing mechanism established by the 2003 ICHC. It reveals that the need to manage the listing system so as to avoid the establishment of any kind of hierarchy was generally agreed upon during the negotiations leading to the adoption of the 2003 Convention, but in the end such a system was considered the most effective to ensure appropriate safeguarding for ICH. Indubitably, the presence of the lists ensures better visibility for the Convention, especially outside the limited circle of experts in the field. Furthermore, the two lists make the international system of safeguarding of ICH more concrete than it might be in the case that they did not exist, make the Convention more likely to attract the consent of a high number of States, and help in fostering awareness-raising of the significance of ICH which is decisive for the realization of the purposes of the Convention. Last but not least, the listing system ensures consistency with the duty for States Parties to draw up inventories of the ICH present in their respective territories.

Lenzerini, F. (2020). Part II Commentary, Art.16–17 Listing Intangible Cultural Heritage. In L.L. J. Blake (a cura di), The 2003 UNESCO Intangible Heritage Convention: A Commentary (pp. 306-328). Oxford : Oxford University Press.

Part II Commentary, Art.16–17 Listing Intangible Cultural Heritage

Federico Lenzerini
2020-01-01

Abstract

This chapter looks at the listing mechanism established by the 2003 ICHC. It reveals that the need to manage the listing system so as to avoid the establishment of any kind of hierarchy was generally agreed upon during the negotiations leading to the adoption of the 2003 Convention, but in the end such a system was considered the most effective to ensure appropriate safeguarding for ICH. Indubitably, the presence of the lists ensures better visibility for the Convention, especially outside the limited circle of experts in the field. Furthermore, the two lists make the international system of safeguarding of ICH more concrete than it might be in the case that they did not exist, make the Convention more likely to attract the consent of a high number of States, and help in fostering awareness-raising of the significance of ICH which is decisive for the realization of the purposes of the Convention. Last but not least, the listing system ensures consistency with the duty for States Parties to draw up inventories of the ICH present in their respective territories.
2020
9780198824787
Lenzerini, F. (2020). Part II Commentary, Art.16–17 Listing Intangible Cultural Heritage. In L.L. J. Blake (a cura di), The 2003 UNESCO Intangible Heritage Convention: A Commentary (pp. 306-328). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Oxford Scholarly Authorities on International Law_ Part II Commentary, Art.16–17 Listing Intangible Cultural Heritage in_ The 2003 UNESCO Intangible Heritage Convention.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Descrizione e abstract
Tipologia: Post-print
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione 83.12 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
83.12 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
F. Lenzerini_Commentary ICH Convention_2020 (proofs).pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: Bozze finali
Tipologia: Post-print
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 290.89 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
290.89 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1111972