First, I will expose an analysis of appeals to visual models on the basis of the epistemological approach to argumentation, thereby using Dove’s very instructive examples. Subsequently I will compare Dove’s Waltonian theory of the appeal to visual models with this epistemological analysis and in doing so assess the relative advantages of both approaches.
Lumer, C. (2016). Commentary on “On Appeals to (Visual) Models”: Appeals to Visual Models – An Epistemological Reconstruction of an Argument Type. In Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 18-21 May 2016 (pp.1-10). Windsor, Canada (Ontario) : University of Windsor.
Commentary on “On Appeals to (Visual) Models”: Appeals to Visual Models – An Epistemological Reconstruction of an Argument Type
Christoph Lumer
2016-01-01
Abstract
First, I will expose an analysis of appeals to visual models on the basis of the epistemological approach to argumentation, thereby using Dove’s very instructive examples. Subsequently I will compare Dove’s Waltonian theory of the appeal to visual models with this epistemological analysis and in doing so assess the relative advantages of both approaches.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
A112_Lumer_AppealsToVisualModels_Print.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Post-print
Licenza:
PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione
701.45 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
701.45 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1089146