The contribution critically discusses Walton's (and Reed’s and Macagno’s) argumentation scheme approach. On the one hand, its enormous richness and closeness to the empirical argumentation material is appreciated, but, on the other, fundamental conceptual weaknesses are revealed. Although the approach more recently has been declared to strive for “true beliefs and correct choices” it has not systematically developed the proposed schemes in a way that these goals are reached. Accordingly, many proposed schemes are fallacious from an epistemological standpoint.
Lumer, C. (2016). Walton’s Argumentation Schemes. In Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias (pp.1-20). Windsor, Canada (Ontario) : University of Windsor.
Walton’s Argumentation Schemes
Christoph Lumer
2016-01-01
Abstract
The contribution critically discusses Walton's (and Reed’s and Macagno’s) argumentation scheme approach. On the one hand, its enormous richness and closeness to the empirical argumentation material is appreciated, but, on the other, fundamental conceptual weaknesses are revealed. Although the approach more recently has been declared to strive for “true beliefs and correct choices” it has not systematically developed the proposed schemes in a way that these goals are reached. Accordingly, many proposed schemes are fallacious from an epistemological standpoint.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
A111.2_Lumer_Walton’sArgumentationSchemes_Print.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Post-print
Licenza:
PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione
864.81 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
864.81 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1088915