The majority of pansharpening methods can be classified as spectral or spatial methods, depending on whether they are based on component substitution (CS) or multiresolution analysis (MRA). So far, the suitability of one class or methods rather than another has been seldom discussed. In this paper, through experiments on IKONOS and simulated Pleíades datasets, the authors demonstrate that the performances of spectral methods depend on the extent of spectral matching, measured by the coefficient of determination (CD) of the multivariate regression between MS and P. For data with simulated P, CD is very close to one and all methods perform almost identically. For true IKONOS datasets, the CD is few percent lower and spatial methods, once they have been optimized through the knowledge of the modulation transfer function (MTF) of the imaging system, are always more performing than spectral methods. Since spatial methods are unaffected by the spectral matching, they are preferable whenever such an issue is critical, e.g., for hyperspectral pansharpening.
Scheda prodotto non validato
Scheda prodotto in fase di analisi da parte dello staff di validazione
|Titolo:||Are spectral or spatial methods better for pansharpening? An evaluation for four sample methods based on spatial modulation of pixel spectra|
|Citazione:||Alparone, L., Garzelli, A., & Vivone, G. (2015). Are spectral or spatial methods better for pansharpening? An evaluation for four sample methods based on spatial modulation of pixel spectra. In Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering (pp.96430V). SPIE.|
|Appare nelle tipologie:||4.1 Contributo in Atti di convegno|
File in questo prodotto: