The exercise of the injunction is unrelated to the recurrence of the subjective assumptions of willful misconduct or negligence (art. 2598) as the potential damage alone is necessary and sufficient, i.e. the potential attitude of the defendant's conduct to damage the company of the promoter of the action.
Bevivino, V. (2012). Sanzioni [Commento sub art. 2599]. In G. Bonilini, M. Confortini, C. Granelli (a cura di), Codice Civile Ipertestuale Commentato (pp. 6745-6747). Torino : UTET Giuridica.
Sanzioni [Commento sub art. 2599]
VITO BEVIVINO
2012-01-01
Abstract
The exercise of the injunction is unrelated to the recurrence of the subjective assumptions of willful misconduct or negligence (art. 2598) as the potential damage alone is necessary and sufficient, i.e. the potential attitude of the defendant's conduct to damage the company of the promoter of the action.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Bevivino - Bonilini Comm Art 2599 CCComm 2ed 2012.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
242.38 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
242.38 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento:
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1279557