The book investigates a method that relies on the distinction between paradigm and borderline cases and that was used by H.L.A. Hart and A.M. Honoré in their studies of concepts. By focusing on some of their works and showing both the connection and the distinction between their methodological views and other philosophers’ ideas, the text aims to shed light on one of the most important kinds of conceptual analysis in philosophy of law.
Zambon, A. (2024). Analysis and Paradigm Cases in Philosophy of Law: An Essay on H.L.A. Hart's and A.M. Honoré's Method. Torino : Giappichelli.
Analysis and Paradigm Cases in Philosophy of Law: An Essay on H.L.A. Hart's and A.M. Honoré's Method
Adriano Zambon
2024-01-01
Abstract
The book investigates a method that relies on the distinction between paradigm and borderline cases and that was used by H.L.A. Hart and A.M. Honoré in their studies of concepts. By focusing on some of their works and showing both the connection and the distinction between their methodological views and other philosophers’ ideas, the text aims to shed light on one of the most important kinds of conceptual analysis in philosophy of law.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1275494
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo