In this article, a new, idealizing-hermeneutic methodological approach to developing a theory of philosophical arguments is presented and carried out. The basis for this is a theory of ideal philosophical theory types developed from the analysis of historical examples. According to this theory, the following ideal types of theory exist in philosophy: 1. descriptive-nomological, 2. idealizing-hermeneutic, 3. technical-constructive, 4. ontic-practical. These types of theories are characterized in particular by what their basic types of theses are. The main task of this article is then to determine the types of arguments that are suitable for justifying these types of theses. Surprisingly, practical arguments play a key role here.

Lumer, C. (2020). A Theory of Philosophical Arguments. In O.S.f.t.S.o.A. OSSA (a cura di), Evidence, Persuasion & Diversity. Proceedings of Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, Vol. 12 (2020) (pp. 1-36). Windsor, Canada : OSSA, Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.

A Theory of Philosophical Arguments

Christoph Lumer
2020-01-01

Abstract

In this article, a new, idealizing-hermeneutic methodological approach to developing a theory of philosophical arguments is presented and carried out. The basis for this is a theory of ideal philosophical theory types developed from the analysis of historical examples. According to this theory, the following ideal types of theory exist in philosophy: 1. descriptive-nomological, 2. idealizing-hermeneutic, 3. technical-constructive, 4. ontic-practical. These types of theories are characterized in particular by what their basic types of theses are. The main task of this article is then to determine the types of arguments that are suitable for justifying these types of theses. Surprisingly, practical arguments play a key role here.
2020
Lumer, C. (2020). A Theory of Philosophical Arguments. In O.S.f.t.S.o.A. OSSA (a cura di), Evidence, Persuasion & Diversity. Proceedings of Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, Vol. 12 (2020) (pp. 1-36). Windsor, Canada : OSSA, Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
A122_Lumer_ATheoryOfPhilosophicalArguments_Print.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Post-print
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione 499.5 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
499.5 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1123969