Alessandro Tassoni’s mock-heroic poem La secchia rapita (1622) and Francesco Redi’s dithyramb Bacco in Toscana (1685) are among the most influential seventeenth-century texts accompanied with exegetic notes written by their respective authors. Tassoni’s ‘Dichiarazioni’ (‘Explanations’) were included in the definitive version of his poem (Venice, 1630) and responded – in very personal and often idiosyncratic fashion – to reactions generated by the poem’s previous circulation in manuscript and in print. The eccentric attitude is even more pronounced in Redi’s ‘Annotazioni’ to his Bacco in Toscana, although in an altogether different tone and for a different purpose. Words and phrases are singled out with extravagant selectivity to display the author’s erudition in a wide range of fields, notably etymology and historical linguistics. The dominant digressive mode makes Redi’s commentary virtually a stand-alone text, where the obligation to elucidate the main text is only occasionally and capriciously fulfilled.
Caruso, C. (2019). Mockery and Erudition: Alessandro Tassoni’s ‘Secchia rapita’ and Francesco Redi’s ‘Bacco in Toscana’. In F. Venturi (a cura di), Self-Commentary in Early Modern European Literature, 1400-1700 (pp. 395-419). Leiden : Brill.
Mockery and Erudition: Alessandro Tassoni’s ‘Secchia rapita’ and Francesco Redi’s ‘Bacco in Toscana’
Caruso, Carlo
2019-01-01
Abstract
Alessandro Tassoni’s mock-heroic poem La secchia rapita (1622) and Francesco Redi’s dithyramb Bacco in Toscana (1685) are among the most influential seventeenth-century texts accompanied with exegetic notes written by their respective authors. Tassoni’s ‘Dichiarazioni’ (‘Explanations’) were included in the definitive version of his poem (Venice, 1630) and responded – in very personal and often idiosyncratic fashion – to reactions generated by the poem’s previous circulation in manuscript and in print. The eccentric attitude is even more pronounced in Redi’s ‘Annotazioni’ to his Bacco in Toscana, although in an altogether different tone and for a different purpose. Words and phrases are singled out with extravagant selectivity to display the author’s erudition in a wide range of fields, notably etymology and historical linguistics. The dominant digressive mode makes Redi’s commentary virtually a stand-alone text, where the obligation to elucidate the main text is only occasionally and capriciously fulfilled.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Caruso Mockery and Erudition.pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione: Articolo in volume
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
185.05 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
185.05 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/1028905