The impact of protection on economic growth has enjoyed a revival in recent times, with the publication of a number of comparative quantitative papers. They all share a common weakness: they measure protection as the ratio of custom revenues to import value, which biases results if demand for imports is not perfectly inelastic. In this paper, we show that the measure of protection matters. We estimate the Anderson and Neary (2005) Trade Restrictiveness Index (TRI) for Italy from unification to the Great Depression. We suggest a different interpretation of some key moments of Italian trade policy and we show that the aggregate welfare losses were small in the long run and mostly related to protection on sugar in the 1880s and 1890s. We document that using different measures of protection affects results of the causal relation between trade policy on economic growth in Italy and in the United States. Accordingly, we argue that a systematic re-estimating of protection in the economic history of trade policy is needed.
Federico, G., Vasta, M. (2015). What do we really know about protection before the Great Depression: evidence from Italy. THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC HISTORY, 75(4), 993-1029.
What do we really know about protection before the Great Depression: evidence from Italy
Federico, Giovanni;Vasta, Michelangelo
2015-01-01
Abstract
The impact of protection on economic growth has enjoyed a revival in recent times, with the publication of a number of comparative quantitative papers. They all share a common weakness: they measure protection as the ratio of custom revenues to import value, which biases results if demand for imports is not perfectly inelastic. In this paper, we show that the measure of protection matters. We estimate the Anderson and Neary (2005) Trade Restrictiveness Index (TRI) for Italy from unification to the Great Depression. We suggest a different interpretation of some key moments of Italian trade policy and we show that the aggregate welfare losses were small in the long run and mostly related to protection on sugar in the 1880s and 1890s. We document that using different measures of protection affects results of the causal relation between trade policy on economic growth in Italy and in the United States. Accordingly, we argue that a systematic re-estimating of protection in the economic history of trade policy is needed.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Federico and VASTA (JEH 2015).pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
PDF editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
1.2 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.2 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Federico and VASTA (JEH 2015) pp.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Post-print
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.24 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.24 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
https://hdl.handle.net/11365/979059